The Contradiction of Soul-Taking Rebirth and the Purity of Infants

Eastern religions have long held the belief in the concept of soul-taking rebirth, where individuals are believed to be reincarnated based on their unsettled sins from past lives. However, these same religions also teach that infants are born with pure souls and are not burdened by any sins from previous lives. This apparent contradiction raises intriguing questions and invites a deeper exploration of the philosophical and theological underpinnings of these beliefs.

In order to understand this apparent contradiction, it is essential to delve into the core teachings of Eastern religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. These religions share the belief in the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth, known as samsara. According to this belief, an individual’s actions in one life determine their fate in subsequent lives. This is known as the law of karma.

Within the framework of soul-taking rebirth, it is believed that upon death, the soul of an individual separates from the physical body and takes on a new form in the next life. The circumstances of this rebirth are determined by the accumulated karma of the individual. If one has lived a virtuous life, they may be reborn into a higher social status or even achieve liberation from the cycle of rebirth. Conversely, if one has committed sins or led a morally corrupt life, they may be reborn into a lower social status or experience suffering in their subsequent lives.

However, when it comes to infants, Eastern religions hold the view that they are born with pure souls untainted by the sins of their past lives. This belief stems from the notion that infants are considered innocent beings who have not yet accumulated enough karma to be burdened by the consequences of their actions. They are seen as a fresh start, free from the karmic baggage of their previous existences.

This apparent contradiction can be reconciled by understanding the different perspectives on the nature of the soul and the process of rebirth. In Eastern religions, the soul is believed to be eternal and indestructible. It is not bound by time or space and carries with it the accumulated karma from previous lives. However, the concept of the soul is also seen as dynamic and constantly evolving.

When an individual dies, their soul is believed to undergo a process of purification and transformation before being reborn. This process allows for the shedding of past sins and the potential for spiritual growth. It is during this process that the soul is cleansed of its previous karmic imprints, allowing for a fresh start in the next life.

Infants, on the other hand, are seen as beings who have recently undergone this process of purification and transformation. Their souls are considered to be in a state of purity and innocence, unburdened by the sins of their past lives. It is believed that infants have the opportunity to start anew and make choices that will shape their future karma.

While the belief in soul-taking rebirth and the purity of infants may appear contradictory on the surface, they can be seen as complementary aspects of the Eastern religious worldview. The concept of soul-taking rebirth acknowledges the consequences of past actions and the need for spiritual growth and transformation. At the same time, the belief in the purity of infants emphasizes the potential for redemption and the power of starting afresh.

In conclusion, the apparent contradiction between the belief in soul-taking rebirth and the purity of infants in Eastern religions can be understood within the context of their respective teachings on karma, the nature of the soul, and the process of rebirth. While individuals are believed to be reborn based on their unsettled sins from past lives, infants are considered to be born with pure souls, unburdened by any sins. This paradox highlights the complexity and richness of Eastern religious beliefs and invites us to explore the mysteries of life, death, and the nature of the soul.

The following explanation is satisfactory as there is no reincarnation/transmigration in monotheistic religions:

1. Judaism:View: In Judaism, there is no belief in the transmigration of souls or reincarnation. Infants are not seen as carrying sins from past lives. Judaism emphasizes personal responsibility and accountability for one’s actions.
2. Christianity:View: Christianity, particularly within the context of original sin, has diverse interpretations. Many Christian denominations believe in the concept of original sin, suggesting that all humans inherit a sinful nature from the Fall of Adam and Eve. However, the innocence of infants is often emphasized, and baptism is seen as a means to cleanse them of original sin.
3. Islam:View: Islam does not subscribe to the concept of original sin. Infants are considered innocent and sinless. Islam teaches that individuals are accountable for their actions from adolescence onward, and repentance and seeking forgiveness are essential for spiritual growth.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!